The Republican Party
implemented a platform of obstructionism before Obama’s inauguration day. That obstructionism has been held steadfast
as the central foundation of the Party.
What innovative legislation has a Republican controlled House and Senate
proposed in the last sixteen years to address the significant issues of our
country during periods of majority?
The Republican Party
shifted in the 1950’s to combine nationalism and religion post WWII to assist
big business interests to confuse mathematical and scientific macroeconomic
realities in the American people to decrease the power of labor, dominate the
globe through partnered corporate-military imperialism, and market a flag and a
cross so that the vast majority of Americans vote against their economic and
social best interests. The Democratic
Party soon followed along as a pro-business party as faith bedded nationalism
and the money in politics started to dwarf any other issue as television became
king. This is the One Party system we
live under. Both are culpable, but at
its root it started with Billy Graham, Eisenhower, and Vice President Richard
Nixon after the technological advances of WWII sparked the economy.
The Republican cult
of Ronald Reagan is the ultimate modern iteration of these policies which
mathematically produce national debt, increase poverty, consolidate wealth, and
sacrifice long term good of the nation and our planet for the short term gains
of a tiny percentage of the Earth’s population.
Post-Regan Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama have all played forms of this
game, but the Progressive agenda pushing from the far left, which used to be
center left in FDR’s era, has forced the Democratic Party to adapt. Has it fully, no, but the economic policy
from the Democratic side of the aisle of: a single payer option, raising the
minimum wage to a living wage, ending citizens united, addressing public
university tuition as a hindrance to our labor force, equal pay for equal work,
ending private prisons, and the TPP are all policies to address the gargantuan
problem that trickle-down economics and policies of the Eisenhower/Graham
coalition are structurally flawed in their extreme implementation and are an
abject failure causing the global consolidation of wealth and power. Furthermore the One-Party system’s
intentional obfuscation of what constitutes wealthy or why public tax resources
are scarce and where all the wealth created over the last thirty years is
hinders the American people from comprehending how such progressive policies
could be funded in an economy no longer married to the interests of the
wealthiest global citizens and not suffer massive inflation largely due to the
advances in technology capable of meeting the basic survival needs of the
average human being.
The greatest value
of the Republican Party in the counter balance is mathematical conservatism
that a government cannot spend its way into solutions without interdependence
with the private economy of its citizens.
The problem is that the Republican Party long ago abandoned mathematical
conservatism and science based policy.
The top wealth holders have extricated their self-interest from the U.S.
population. The stagflation of the
1970’s was not cured by trickledown economics.
Stagflation was cured by advances in technology and changes in global
political markets.
What the modern
economy truly needs is a global tax on capital.
The misunderstanding of how functional income tax rates work for both
corporations, high income individuals, middle class, and those living in
poverty is part of the big business agenda.
The One Party system does not want you to understand the math or the
functional results of that math which cannot be cured after thirty plus years
of implementation by shifting the burden of correction on wealth created here
forward; we must also target the giant pile of wealth created during those
thirty years.
Without getting too
wonky, I have spent my adult life as a CPA.
I have audited publicly traded companies, large and medium sized private
businesses, non profits, large and small governmental entities, prepared the
tax returns for corporations, estates, and individuals, and worked as the
controller of a large private company. I
have seen behind the wall of what a lot of different shades of the economic
spectrum pay in employee and employer compensation in addition to understanding
the tax code and governmental budgeting on a level probably beyond the average
citizen. The concise end result is that
the deductions high income individuals get to utilize prior to their income
ever being determined are far more pertinent to the equation than the tax rate
as long as that tax rate is within its modern historical standard deviation. The profit-based healthcare system is the
largest unnecessary and dysfunctional tax the American people pay inside both
the private and public economies. The
lobbying power of big business has manipulated the tax code for this to
happen. Without a coordinated global tax
on capital in addition to income by the world’s superpowers while also
eliminating tax shelters in countries like Ireland and Bermuda the mammoth
aggregation of wealth sleeping in banks doing very little for the Earth’s
population will not functionally change.
Most importantly as the leader of the globe’s economy America must lead the
charge to account for the planet Earth as capital on the balance sheet of
humanity rather than an asset of Wall Street to avoid the extinction of our
species. This change in accounting is a
function of both generally accepted accounting principles affecting financial
reporting and tax code in a conducive political habitat.
So in short: change deductions,
fix profit-based healthcare, fix lobbying and citizens united, and implement a
global tax on capital that recognizes the Earth as equity owned by humanity and
not firms. Those should be the pillars
of how-do-we-fix-this-mess. The elected officials of the Republican Party are
across the board in opposition to these solutions. This is largely due to the fact that the
elected officials of both parties have been farmed to serve business over
citizens since the aforementioned shift in the 1950’s. The average person sees the end result of but
not cause of the problems, agrees across the aisle far more often than
television would lead us to believe on solutions, and on each side of the aisle
are disgusted with both parties. (i.e.
the popularity of Sanders and Trump)
A democracy is a
living organism. Throwing one’s hands up
as I will not vote or that the only insertion of our minds into the political
arena is on election day is a false understanding of democracy. There is no us and them, there is only
us. Arguing only blue or red often in
concepts engineered by both sides of the aisle as wedge issues like religion,
patriotism, or nationalism is the language of alienated complacency. Misunderstanding that in this election we
have large numbers of Republicans upset Trump got the nomination by following
the will of the electorate and we have large numbers of Democrats upset Clinton
cheated in what appears to be a rigged primary to hinder the will of the
electorate. Both nominees are candidates
of war, bombing, and business. This is
no massive victory for the proletariat.
No comments:
Post a Comment