Monday, May 30, 2016

Memorial Day 20160530

What am I doing this memorial day -working on the new book while watching Citizen Four and intentionally posting that on the internet. Orwellian freedoms#
Where is the head cage of rats applied;soldiers died for metadata, the war on terrorism is about domestic compliance to exploit and extend fear to comply so that one will abide freedoms to the corporate powers controlling the one-party system of government to want you to consume and buy (obey advertising) rather than understand what freedom is; choice, natural empathy to care about a human's life in Afghanistan or Sudan as much as your neighbor in Chicago due to the illusions of statism and racism, because you are taught to only care about yourself, how much is in your bank account, your kid's private school instead of the public.
Freedom is about freedom of thought; that is the true war, the memorial of what the heart of the solider is about to live without monitoring or repression or one country supporting regimes over Poor people, this dichotomy of purposes begs the gray of what are we doing in this country, what freedom, who is empowered, who is profiting? These are complicated questions in our Darwinian evolution of choosing between how we approach the subject of entropy and asserting order in massive systems of self identification in mental sub species of words like American Caucasian Christian and insert political party and so forth so that we overlook the species of human. 
Darwin wrote about how the greatest competition for survival is often within the same species fighting for a common resource; one kind of oak or sheep wins. Dostoevsky wrote, "One reptile will devour another" and of "malignant individualism". This is our extinction staring us in the face of blind obedience for the sake of an illusion of safety misunderstanding the prestidigitation of the true enemy, our own compliance to allow our fellow humans to be treated as non-human, to be drone bombed or judged terrorist for a synthetic illusion marketed by whom and for what? A number in a fraternity of bank accounts tallying our self annihilation.
Therein the true war is consciousness,empathy, seeing ourselves as part of an interconnected whole, beholden to evolving to comprehend water rights, female reproductive rights, taxes on global capital to address the consolidation of wealth, these are the modern battlegrounds. The bombs, the missiles these are symbols in a greater game mankind has long played, of power, control, and freedom of the mind.
Citizenfour Poster

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Why replacing humans with robots is on the fulcrum of our destruction and empathetic evolution…

There is a basic idea in economics about a threshold of resources to support the mandatory needs of a member of humanity: food, health, housing, clothing, and this addendum of participation either through companionship, frivolity, love, empathy, and presence in our common universe.  When we see a factory of laboring humans swapped for a militia of robots, Capitalism sees a mathematical formula of lower expenses, firm retains surplus and the members of humanity expunged are no longer pertinent to the equation.  Time’s progression has seen technology at the fulcrum on a lever to balance the rewards to either firm profits in the hands of the few in a Capitalist paradigm or to lower the quantity of labor by collective humanity required to meet that threshold of resources to support the mandatory needs of humanity in a socialist paradigm.

In Capitalism unemployment is worthlessness, oblivion.  In socialism one can see the advancements in medicine, agrarian yield rates, textile durability, and construction capacity and think we can work less and produce more as long as there is a threshold of firms and labor still motivated to work.  This balance is at the heart of Marx’s imperfect manifesto.  The best embodiment of that ideal is Democratic Socialism with an appropriate mix of the private economy in industries of free trade motivation to labor and socialist application in those of common good.

The answer in the modern economy is job-sharing, taxes on the aggregation of capital, conservation of environmental resources, sexual education and healthcare including a shift to empathetic matriarchal forms of governance to prioritize women’s rights as a means of birth control, and focusing on systematic infrastructure investment. 

Quality of life is improving with technology to help us connect, but firms keep moving the line of forced desperation in order to make the masses think that art, taking time away from toil to be alive, to not think you are a rat in a 65 life-can-start inescapable maze to keep you under control and not question authority or the firm keeping the difference or if that line of desperation is anything but a manufactured quotient of division.  The challenge of humanity is to switch the preponderance of the resources from accumulating into the accounts of firms to create balance leveraged by technology to meet the needs of our global community as we participate in an evolution of empathy. 




  

  

Saturday, May 21, 2016

Immortality or Being

Immortality is really the crux of it now isn’t it;
The immortal soul in fresh casings
The glittering barter of monk’s mead and meditative currency
The kowtow bow-down and the sycophantic ego

The game-chain of abortion is about when the seed starts
The earned chip of the immortal soul forged
The miraculous biogenesis of sperm and egg
Acquiring a totem for the toll of heaven’s gate

If the body is but a vehicle of flesh dynamic
This atomic transposition perpetual, cellular shed and replenish indifferent
To the soul’s attachment acting not as us (for there is no us)
Only an everything from which our ego demands segmentation

In exchange for a parceled immortal soul
For in this is the paradox
A theistic god is the worship of the ego
The universal consciousness demands nothing

Worship is foolish barter with the idea of self
To grant passage into paradise or perdition
Rather than presence in what is
As the atomic permits perception of the constant oneness

Never beginning, distant, or ceasing
So that all attempts to journey towards earning in biological paradigm
Ignore the very thing existence is, that we are, that being is

This concept of immortality as an organic finish line and divine start
Obliterates in the gazing of the now comprehending we are here
Caked under layered veils the first of which is the mind’s creation of the immortal soul
So that we must be us, to us, and in the ego’s annihilation our participation in existence ends

Bullocks! One was never awarded an angel’s pinned lottery ticket of immortality
Inside like a glowing sphere of consciousness, one is possibility in the atomic and love in the universal
These are the scales on which existence balances.  

So it is this notion of in-uterus progeny and soldiers massacred in toil
The maddening cries for ration, control, and why god of malignant insurgent cancerous bodies
These structured webs of ill comprehension dissolve in understanding the immortal soul
And its parent in the ego have never existed but in the manifestation of perception misnamed as consciousness in the boot start up of the source code of the mind

In release of this penchant to be immortal we can begin to be beyond time 

Watching the Enfilade

What does it mean to be alive compared to say be space,
The location in space time absent of atoms
Is there a connection between the four dimensions of that space
And what, where, and when a being is?

Breathing of calculated mind aware of one’s existence
And intercourse in a mathematical formula projected from source code
Interpreting reality through symbols seeing portions of spectrum in light
Hearing in spectrums of sound,

Sensing in spectrums of touch as the atomic ball bearings rustle
Odors permeating that space in fractions of count in a range of detection
Tasting the elemental formulaic construction of the planet in the battery of eons
Upon the tongue of what is deathly ambrosia and what is survival

The mathematics in our bones pulsing the atoms of the brain that never escape
Is this a soul’s atomic treasure, held in the body amongst the laughter spark
Of ceasing biological consciousness in perpetuity with no chance of reboot
To have that brain atom decay in crypt or burn in cremation

Symbols, symbols and postulating Schrödinger’s box
Felines are we bathing in cyanide and oxygen bartering time
For comprehension of the layers we have so chosen to reduce the evolutionary spectrums
To limit perception to this vehicle humming and licking sky-atoms

Preserving the carcass over the awareness of being beyond the carrier
Participating in the release of attachment to be this self
To comprehend the limitations of the measurement detectors on the starship
That the universe is not of mind or concern and bathe in the beatitude of indifference

To see that love is not about receipt or sale, but of the currency
Of possibility exchanging into consciousness
That one is conscious of what one is
In a paradigm beyond all the accustomed spectrums of perception

This is the paradox of the box, the genius of the planted seed
Doing its fervent action in soil like a mad hatter clock burgeoning existence
In the language of universal mathematics of the genome
Elemental result of atomic movement in arrangement at a moment in space time

To amalgamate into a body bearing genetic ballet,
Flowering enfilade of perception watching us shoot ourselves 

Sunday, May 8, 2016

To Our Mother

At some point it clicked in me possessions are irrelevant
Token exchanges of credits in banks,
I mean banks do not even have the money they lend
They lend you digits in a computer and trade on the idea of being invested

Mothers do not work like that; your blood is invested in our veins
Genome, pressure, the act of creation in mitosis with the split half cell of our father
This is not done with anything but presence
The act of love and enlivening perpetuation on some level, but selflessness

To want the happiness of the son or daughter freely without condition
I have felt your love without condition
Even in the times I know my feet are in waters beyond the depth of your travels
I see you on that shoreline and in the strength of my muscles knowledgeable of how to swim

I see the moon and sun echoing these waves differently because of you
The blood of my mouth pouring in your worries
Of what words come out and why in the quiet silences entrusted to your ears
Because I know yours is a vault beyond the lock of judgment

I have felt the release to be who I am
Which at times is gnarled and mashed, spirited and away
From a path of certitude about what love is or how it works,
But I know you love me, as my mother, unconditionally and forthright

This I have never doubted
The beauty of such a flower is a perpetual bloom
One seeded in the diligence of concern of thinking of my brothers and me
In a cache of your chest pumping and pressing

Wanting for our joys and tearing in the bastions of our sorrows
Knowing your arms are there secure
To hold us when we need asking for nothing in return,
But us to be who we are

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Why Donald Trump is the Republican Presidential nominee…

There is anger in white Anglo Saxon protestant heterosexual cis-gendered men of say over forty about time slipping through hands that were comfortable being atop an American hierarchy.  The world is passing these men by as the spotlight of power and decision making shifts.  The global consolidation of wealth hindering humanity from properly addressing exponential resource scarcity given carbon emissions and population growth is the greatest anthropogenic extinction threat our species has ever faced.  In response to this Trump voters know something is wrong with our global community, but reach towards isolationism, violence, xenophobia, and blame for the diminishing WASP hierarchy in all forms as the redress to explain rather than to do the math or review the science. 

Trump is a fake billionaire with zero political experience who has directly benefited from the Neoliberal policies of the last thirty years of Congress and Wall Street.  Trump had his wealth handed to him in the bassinet along with an endless list of safety nets for all his failed business ventures.  Trump dodged Vietnam on four deferments.  He has been divorced twice and straddles his current object trophy wife.  Trump named his yacht after himself.  Trump financed his Taj Mahal with junk bonds and went bankrupt to go with his many bankruptcies.  Trump hosted a reality show with fake celebrities applying in a fake competition for fake jobs. 

Trump has spent more time in the ring of Wrestlemania than crafting public policy. The man makes up stories without accountability to ballyhoo his life and disparage his critics.  Fact checking does not exist in Trump’s world.  When confronted with facts Trump acts like a bully, puffs his chest like he learned at his silver spoon fake military academy, says something off the handle to ingratiate himself to a nation of confused emasculated WASP men because Trump talks tough, doesn’t take lip from any human who does not fit the gender, racial, religious, ethnic, or sexual orientation identity of the WASP American heterosexual male.

This started most fervently when Obama was elected and the GOP initiated a complete policy of obstructionism.  The WASP hierarchy sees a black president, a white woman in the wings, and a non-Christian white man as the next viable candidate.  Trump supporters see this wealthy, stubborn, arrogant, Protestant man telling them who to blame: Muslims, Mexicans, women, transgendered bathroom policies, homosexual marriage laws, and black lives matters activists.  Trump voters hear words like white privilege and often feel personally attacked misunderstanding what systematic institutional advantages are lashing back at ideas like political correctness as limp-dick bullshit.  Trump barks about kicking another group’s ass, building walls, torturing, his daughter as a sex object, obliterating health coverage, banning immigrants based on religion, and a course testicle-centered agenda that is largely likely unconstitutional.

Trump speaks to reinforce the WASP’s are not crazy for wanting to make America ‘great’ again, which could translate to make America WASP again.  Computers, empathy, a racial rainbow, non-Christian viewpoints, gender as a spectrum, sexuality as a spectrum, climate change, and economics based in math are the political enemies of Trump.  Many aging WASP’s do not want to change, learn, or expand a comfort zone.  Many are retiring Boomers who just want to hold on to the piece they have accumulated until they die before climate change becomes their problem and they don’t want the government coming to take a larger piece of their nest egg to meet the whines of the non-WASP’s in the meantime.  It is ego policy.  With Trump GOP voters assume they get to keep a bigger piece; the rest is not the WASP’s problem or concern.  They want a man in charge with guns who is going to stop the ‘nonsense’. 

The consolidation of wealth through big business ballooned from the merging of Christian and Capitalist America against labor since the Eisenhower administration.  Every president through Obama has relied on two parties being able to blame each other for what goes on behind the scenes to keep the masses desperate so that the top economic percent can hoard wealth and power under the idea that a good laborer is thankful for her or his job, does not complain, takes the wage, does not ask questions while the employer sits in the representative seat of grand wizard.  Trump is the implosion of the wizard’s curtain.  That is why the GOP is so afraid and will start looking to Hillary Clinton to keep the status quo by not offering full explicit or tacit support of Trump in the general election in all the things they hold back in saying that they might have with Romney four years ago. 

The GOP has a population trending problem due to the diminished ignorance of the average younger voter due to the internet and the lower birth rates of middle to upper middle class white Americans.  Younger people are less religious, which is the number one tool the GOP has used to get voters to vote against their economic self interest and less white.  The GOP has tried to distract a base with abortion, gay marriage, terrorism panic, and the old communist undertones from the 1950’s about anything resembling a single payer healthcare system.  The GOP most of all has become the anti science and anti math party willfully spreading ignorance about the federal deficit and climate change.

The GOP had to create this anger in the WASP voting pool to keep a coalition of evangelicals, the mega rich, libertarians, traditional party liners, and angry poor white flag-waving church-going gun-toting pick-up truck drivers who vote against their economic self-interest together given birth rates.  Every statistic of America’s voters getting less white and younger threatens the Republican WASP power base.  This has been a long-term engineered backfire that started when Richard Nixon was Eisenhower’s vice president to consolidate wealth by repressing the power of labor.  Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump represent two sides of the same coin headed to Washington D.C.  Sanders is explosion.  Trump is implosion. 

Cognitive dissonance to the societal order is spewing like an oil derrick blue and red.  The Republican version is orange faced, has a bad toupee and is fist pumping, name calling, and speaking like a C minus student who didn’t do his homework before the class presentation, but his daddy gives a lot to the school’s foundation so we are going to give him a better grade than he deserves.  Trump has money, attractive women in his photo ops, toys, and talks like a professional wrestler.  It is staged choreography.  He’s a sideshow taking the main stage because somewhere in the American WASP gut is an understanding is that they have been had. 

Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and men like Mitt Romney have been playing them for fools.  Trump is pointing this out and threatens to take the whole thing down, which is in the very root of it why he is so popular.  It is not that the WASP’s in majority support Trump’s racism or xenophobia or anti-Muslim agenda.  Sure there are bigots in the crew, but that is not enough to pull the numbers Trump is getting; it is the understanding of the stench of supply side economics, the lies, and needing something to change.  Trump is like walking a bomb into Washington D.C. and saying anarchy, let’s destroy it all; this place is a bad joke that is no longer funny.  It’s not funny and hasn’t been for a long, long time. 



Artistically the white sour cream undisturbed floating aloft in a giant lump segregated from the more populous brown ground meet and yellow cheese as a foundation held inside a wall. You can hear the handlers orchestrating this salad he would never otherwise eat. Who would believe that man would be so busy "working" he would eat at his 'desk'? He has old school newspaper and magazines under it, some golf trophy he probably awarded himself.  His family photos are lumped by the window, one on the floor, a pile of paper blueprints and a half opened drawer. Is this indicative of the level of attention to detail and focus on technology this hair piece would bring as president...  Bobble heads of yourself are always nice.

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Quotes - The Broom of the System - David Foster Wallace

The Broom of the System - David Foster Wallace 

“...that, to repeat what I heard for years and years and suspect you’ve been hearing over and over, yourself, something’s meaning is nothing more or less than its function. Et cetera et cetera et cetera. Has she done the thing with the broom with you? No? What does she use now? No. What she did with me--I must have been eight, or twelve, who remembers--was to sit me down in the kitchen and take a straw broom and start furiously sweeping the floor, and she asked me which part of the broom was more elemental, more fundamental, in my opinion, the bristles or the handle. The bristles or the handle. And I hemmed and hawed, and she swept more and more violently, and I got nervous, and finally when I said I supposed the bristles, because you could after a fashion sweep without the handle, by just holding on to the bristles, but couldn’t sweep with just the handle, she tackled me, and knocked me out of my chair, and yelled into my ear something like, ’Aha, that’s because you want to sweep with the broom, isn’t it? It’s because of what you want the broom for, isn’t it?’ Et cetera. And that if what we wanted a broom for was to break windows, then the handle was clearly the fundamental essence of the broom, and she illustrated with the kitchen window, and a crowd of the domestics gathered; but that if we wanted the broom to sweep with, see for example the broken glass, sweep sweep, the bristles were the thing’s essence. No? What now, then? With pencils? No matter. Meaning as fundamentalness. Fundamentalness as use. Meaning as use. Meaning as fundamentalness.”


That as people age, accumulate more and more private experiences, their sense of history tightens, narrows, becomes more personal? So that to the extent that they remember events of social importance, they remember only for example 'where they were' when such-and-such occurred. Et cetera et cetera. Objective events and data become naturally more and more subjectively colored.”


“Weight Watchers holds as a descriptive axiom the transparently true fact that for each of us the universe is deeply and sharply and completely divided into for example in my case, me, on one side, and everything else, on the other. This for each of us exhaustively defines the whole universe... And then they hold by a prescriptive axiom the undoubtedly equally true and inarguable fact that we each ought to desire our own universe to be as full as possible, that the Great Horror consists in an empty, rattling personal universe, one where one finds oneself with Self, on one hand, and vastly empty lonely spaces before Others begin to enter the picture at all, on the other. A non-full universe... The emptier one’s universe is, the worse it is... Weight Watchers perceives the problem as one involving the need to have as much Other around as possible, so that the relation is one of minimum Self to maximum Other... We each need a full universe. Weight Watchers and their allies would have us systematically decrease the Self-component of the universe, so that the great Other-set will be physically attracted to the now more physically attractive Self, and rush in to fill the void caused by that diminution of Self. Certainly not incorrect, but just as certainly only half of the range of valid solutions to the full-universe problem... Is my drift getting palpable? Just as in genetic engineering... There is always more than one solution... An autonomously full universe... Rather than diminishing Self to entice Other to fill our universe, we may also of course obviously choose to fill the universe with Self... Yes. I plan to grow to infinite size... There will of course eventually cease to be room for anyone else in the universe at all.” ―

Quotes - Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity - David Foster Wallace

Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity - David Foster Wallace 


“What exactly do ‘motion’ and ‘existence’ denote? We know that concrete particular things exist, and that sometimes they move. Does motion per se exist? In what way? In what way do abstractions exist? Of course, that last question is itself very abstract. Now you can probably feel the headache starting. There’s a special sort of unease or impatience with stuff like this. Like ‘What exactly is existence?’ or ‘What exactly do we mean when we talk about motion?’ The unease is very distinctive and sets in only at a certain level in the abstraction process—because abstraction proceeds in levels, rather like exponents or dimensions. Let’s say ‘man’ meaning some particular man is Level One. ‘Man’ meaning the species is Level Two. Something like ‘humanity’ or ‘humanness’ is Level Three; now we’re talking about the abstract criteria for something qualifying as human. And so forth. Thinking this way can be dangerous, weird. Thinking abstractly enough about anything … surely we’ve all had the experience of thinking about a word—‘pen,’ say—and of sort of saying the word over and over to ourselves until it ceases to denote; the very strangeness of calling something a pen begins to obtrude on the consciousness in a creepy way, like an epileptic aura.”

Quotes from David Foster Wallace - Consider the Lobster


Consider the Lobster and Other Essays - David Foster Wallace 

“...in real life I always seem to have a hard time winding up a conversation or asking somebody to leave, and sometimes the moment becomes so delicate and fraught with social complexity that I'll get overwhelmed trying to sort out all the different possible ways of saying it and all the different implications of each option and will just sort of blank out and do it totally straight -- 'I want to terminate the conversation and not have you be in my apartment anymore' -- which evidently makes me look either as if I'm very rude and abrupt or as if I'm semi-autistic and have no sense of how to wind up a conversation gracefully...I've actually lost friends this way.”

“It's not that students don't "get" Kafka's humor but that we've taught them to see humor as something you get -- the same way we've taught them that a self is something you just have. No wonder they cannot appreciate the really central Kafka joke -- that the horrific struggle to establish a human self results in a self whose humanity is inseparable from that horrific struggle. That our endless and impossible journey toward home is in fact our home. It's hard to put into words up at the blackboard, believe me. You can tell them that maybe it's good they don't "get" Kafka. You can ask them to imagine his art as a kind of door. To envision us readers coming up and pounding on this door, pounding and pounding, not just wanting admission but needing it, we don't know what it is but we can feel it, this total desperation to enter, pounding and pushing and kicking, etc. That, finally, the door opens...and it opens outward: we've been inside what we wanted all along. Das ist komisch.”

“Lonely people tend, rather, to be lonely because they decline to bear the psychic costs of being around other humans. They are allergic to people. People affect them too strongly.”

“But the young educated adults of the 90s -- who were, of course, the children of the same impassioned infidelities and divorces Mr. Updike wrote about so beautifully -- got to watch all this brave new individualism and self-expression and sexual freedom deteriorate into the joyless and anomic self-indulgence of the Me Generation. Today's sub-40s have different horrors, prominent among which are anomie and solipsism and a peculiarly American loneliness: the prospect of dying without once having loved something more than yourself.”

censorship always serves the status quo.”

“Is it possible really to love other people? If I’m lonely and in pain, everyone outside me is potential relief—I need them. But can you really love what you need so badly? Isn’t a big part of love caring more about what the other person needs? How am I supposed to subordinate my own overwhelming need to somebody else’s needs that I can’t even feel directly? And yet if I can’t do this, I’m damned to loneliness, which I definitely don’t want … so I’m back at trying to overcome my selfishness for self-interested reasons.” 

“A true Democratic Spirit is up there with religious faith and emotional maturity and all those other top-of-the-Maslow-Pyramid-type qualities that people spend their whole lives working on. A Democratic Spirit's constituent rigor and humility and self-honesty are, in fact, so hard to maintain on certain issues that it's almost irresistibly tempting to fall in with some established dogmatic camp and to follow that camp's line on the issue and to let your position harden within the camp and become inflexible and to believe that the other camps are either evil or insane and to spend all your time and energy trying to shout over them.”


“Is it possible that future generations will regard our present agribuisness and eating practices in much the same way we now view Nero's entertainments or Mengele's experiments? My own initial reaction is that such a comparison is hysterical, extreme - and yet the reason it seems extreme to me appears to be that I believe animals are less morally important than human beings; and when it comes to defending such a belief, even to myself, I have to acknowledge that (a) I have an obvious selfish interest in this belief, since I like to eat certain kinds of animals and want to be able to keep doing it, and (b) I haven't succeeded in working out any sort of personal ethical system in which the belief is truly defensible instead of just selfishly convenient.”

Quotes from David Foster Wallace - Oblivion

Oblivion - David Foster Wallace 

“What goes on inside is just too fast and huge and all interconnected for words to do more than barely sketch the outlines of at most one tiny little part of it at any given instant.”

“The truth is you already know what it's like. You already know the difference between the size and speed of everything that flashes through you and the tiny inadequate bit of it all you can ever let anyone know. As though inside you is this enormous room full of what seems like everything in the whole universe at one time or another and yet the only parts that get out have to somehow squeeze out through one of those tiny keyholes you see under the knob in older doors. As if we are all trying to see each other through these tiny keyholes.

But it does have a knob, the door can open. But not in the way you think...The truth is you've already heard this. That this is what it's like. That it's what makes room for the universes inside you, all the endless inbent fractals of connection and symphonies of different voices, the infinities you can never show another soul. And you think it makes you a fraud, the tiny fraction anyone else ever sees? Of course you're a fraud, of course what people see is never you. And of course you know this, and of course you try to manage what part they see if you know it's only a part. Who wouldn't? It's called free will, Sherlock. But at the same time it's why it feels so good to break down and cry in front of others, or to laugh, or speak in tongues, or chant in Bengali--it's not English anymore, it's not getting squeezed through any hole.

So cry all you want, I won't tell anybody.”

“The paradoxical intercourse of audience and celebrity. The suppressed awareness that the whole reason ordinary people found celebrity fascinating was that they were not, themselves, celebrities. That wasn't quite it. (....) It was more the deeper, more tragic and universal conflict of which the celebrity paradox was a part. The conflict between the subjective centrality of our own lives versus our awareness of its objective insignificance. Atwater knew - as did everyone at Style, though by some strange unspoken consensus it was never said aloud - that this was the single great informing conflict of the American psyche. The management of insignificance. It was the great syncretic bond of US monoculture. It was everywhere, at the root of everything - of impatience in long lines, of cheating on taxes, of movements in fashion and music and art, of marketing. In particular, he thought it was alive in the paradoxes of audience. It was the feeling that celebrities were your intimate friends, coupled with the inchoate awareness that that untold millions of people felt the same way - and that the celebrities themselves did not. Atwater had had contact with a certain number of celebrities (there was no way to avoid it at BSG), and they were not, in his experience, very friendly or considerate people. Which made sense when one considered that celebrities were not actually functioning as real people at all, but as something more like symbols of themselves.”

“If I understand you right,' he says, 'you're saying that you're basically a calculating manipulative person who always says what you think will get somebody to approve of you or form some impression of you you think you want.' I told him that was maybe a little simplistic but basically accurate, and he said further that as he understood it I was saying that I felt as if I was trapped in this false way of being and unable ever to be really open and tell the truth irregardless of whether it'd make me look good in others' eyes or not. And I somewhat resignedly said yes, and that I seemed always to have had this fraudulent, calculating part of my brain firing way all the time, as if I were constantly playing chess with everybody and figuring out that if I wanted them to move a certain way I had to move in such a way as to induce them to move that way. He asked if I ever played chess, and I told him I used to in middle school but quit because I couldn't be as good as I eventually wanted to be, how frustrating it was to get just good enough to know what getting really good at it would be like but not being able to get that good, etc.”

“I balked at trying antidepressants, I just couldn't see myself taking pills to try to be less of a fraud.”

“(..)-Dr. G. would later say that the whole "my whole life flashed before me" phenomenon at the end is more like being a whitecap on the surface of the ocean, meaning that it's only at the moment you subside and start sliding back in that you're really even aware there's an ocean at all. When you're up and out there as a whitecap you might talk and act as if you know you're just a whitecap on the ocean, but deep down you don't think there's really an ocean at all. It's almost impossible to. Or like a leaf that doesn't believe in the tree it's part of, etc. There are all sorts of ways to try to express it.” 

“Atwater knew — as did everyone at Style, though by some strange unspoken consensus it was never said aloud — that this was the single great informing conflict of the American psyche. The management of insignificance. It was the great syncretic bond of US monoculture.”


Quotes from David Foster Wallace - The Pale King

The Pale King - David Foster Wallace 

“How odd I can have all this inside me and to you it’s just words.”

The underlying bureaucratic key is the ability to deal with boredom. To function effectively in an environment that precludes everything vital and human. To breathe, so to speak, without air.

The key is the ability, whether innate or conditioned, to find the other side of the rote, the picayune, the meaningless, the repetitive, the pointlessly complex. To be, in a word, unborable.  It is the key to modern life. If you are immune to boredom, there is literally nothing you cannot accomplish”

“Gentlemen, here is a truth: Enduring tedium over real time in a confined space is what real courage is.... True heroism is minutes, hours, weeks, year upon year of the quiet, precise, judicious exercise of probity and care--with no one there to see or cheer.  This is the world.”

“The truth is that the heroism of your childhood entertainments was not true valor. It was theatre. The grand gesture, the moment of choice, the mortal danger, the external foe, the climactic battle whose outcome resolves all--all designed to appear heroic, to excite and gratify and audience. Gentlemen, welcome to the world of reality--there is no audience. No one to applaud, to admire. No one to see you. Do you understand? Here is the truth--actual heroism receives no ovation, entertains no one. No one queues up to see it. No one is interested.”

“I learned that the world of men as it exists today is a bureaucracy. This is an obvious truth, of course, though it is also one the ignorance of which causes great suffering.

But moreover, I discovered, in the only way that a man ever really learns anything important, the real skill that is required to succeed in a bureaucracy. I mean really succeed: do good, make a difference, serve. I discovered the key. This key is not efficiency, or probity, or insight, or wisdom. It is not political cunning, interpersonal skills, raw IQ, loyalty, vision, or any of the qualities that the bureaucratic world calls virtues, and tests for. The key is a certain capacity that underlies all these qualities, rather the way that an ability to breathe and pump blood underlies all thought and action. 

“Hear this or not, as you will. Learn it now, or later -- the world has time. Routine, repetition, tedium, monotony, ephemeracy, inconsequence, abstraction, disorder, boredom, angst, ennui -- these are the true hero's enemies, and make no mistake, they are fearsome indeed. For they are real.”

“...and suddenly it occurred to him that the birds, whose twitters and repeated songs sounded so pretty and affirming of nature and the coming day, might actually, in a code known only to other birds, be the birds each saying 'Get away' or 'This branch is mine!' or 'This tree is mine! I'll kill you! Kill, kill!' Or any other manner of dark, brutal, or self-protective stuff—they might be listening to war cries. The thought came from nowhere and made his spirits dip for some reason.”

“The next suitable person you’re in light conversation with, you stop suddenly in the middle of the conversation and look at the person closely and say, “What’s wrong?” You say it in a concerned way. He’ll say, “What do you mean?” You say, “Something’s wrong. I can tell. What is it?” And he’ll look stunned and say, “How did you know?” He doesn’t realize something’s always wrong, with everybody.  Often more than one thing. He doesn’t know everybody’s always going around all the time with something wrong and believing they’re exerting great willpower and control to keep other people, for whom they think nothing’s ever wrong, from seeing it. This is the way of people. Suddenly ask what’s wrong and whether they open up and spill their guts or deny it and pretend you’re off, they’ll think you’re perceptive and understanding. They’ll either be grateful, or they’ll be frightened and avoid you from then on. Both reactions have their uses, as we’ll get to. You can play it either way. This works over 90 percent of the time.”

actual TV in waiting rooms, supermarkets' checkouts, airports' gates, SUVs' backseats. Walkmen, iPods, BlackBerries, cell phones that attach to your head. The terror of silence with nothing diverting to do. I can't think anyone really believes that today's so-called 'information society' is just about information. Everyone knows it's about something else, way down.”

“What he'd do, he'd never go out to the length of the chain. He'd never even get out to where the chain got tight. Even if the mailman pulled up, or a salesman. Out of dignity, this dog pretended like he chose this one area to stay in that just happened to be inside the length of the chain. Nothing outside of that area right there interested him. He just had zero interest. So he never noticed the chain. He didn't hate it. The chain. He just up and made it not relevant. maybe he wasn't pretending--maybe he really up and chose that little circle for his own world. He had a power to him. All of his life on that chain.” 

“Corporations are getting better and better at seducing us into thinking the way they think—of profits as the telos and responsibility as something to be enshrined in symbol and evaded in reality. Cleverness as opposed to wisdom. Wanting and having instead of thinking and making. We cannot stop it. I suspect what’ll happen is that there will be some sort of disaster—depression, hyperinflation—and then it’ll be showtime: We’ll either wake up and retake our freedom or we’ll fall apart utterly. Like Rome—conqueror of its own people.”


Quotes from David Foster Wallace - This is Water


This is Water: Some Thoughts Delivered on a Significant Occasion about Living a Compassionate Life - David Foster Wallace


“Because here's something else that's weird but true: in the day-to day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not worshipping. Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to worship. And the compelling reason for maybe choosing some sort of god or spiritual-type thing to worship—be it JC or Allah, be it YHWH or the Wiccan Mother Goddess, or the Four Noble Truths, or some inviolable set of ethical principles—is that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive. If you worship money and things, if they are where you tap real meaning in life, then you will never have enough, never feel you have enough. It's the truth. Worship your body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always feel ugly. And when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally grieve you. On one level, we all know this stuff already. It's been codified as myths, proverbs, clichés, epigrams, parables; the skeleton of every great story. The whole trick is keeping the truth up front in daily consciousness.”

Worship power, you will end up feeling weak and afraid, and you will need ever more power over others to numb you to your own fear. Worship your intellect, being seen as smart, you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out. But the insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they're evil or sinful, it's that they're unconscious. They are default settings.

They're the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that's what you're doing.”

“If you worship money and things — if they are where you tap real meaning in life — then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough. It’s the truth. Worship your own body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always feel ugly, and when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally plant you. On one level, we all know this stuff already — it’s been codified as myths, proverbs, clichés, bromides, epigrams, parables: the skeleton of every great story. The trick is keeping the truth up-front in daily consciousness. Worship power — you will feel weak and afraid, and you will need ever more power over others to keep the fear at bay. Worship your intellect, being seen as smart — you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out. And so on.”

“Look, the insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they're evil or sinful; it is that they are unconscious. They are default-settings. They're the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that's what you're doing. And the world will not discourage you from operating on your default-settings, because the world of men and money and power hums along quite nicely on the fuel of fear and contempt and frustration and craving and the worship of self. Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom to be lords of our own tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the center of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talked about in the great outside world of winning and achieving and displaying. The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day. That is real freedom.  The alternative is unconsciousness, the default-setting, the “rat race” — the constant gnawing sense of having had and lost some infinite thing.” 

“Learning how to think" really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think.  It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience.  Because if you cannot or will not exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed.”

“I know that this stuff probably doesn't sound fun and breezy or grandly inspirational. What it is, so far as I can see, is the truth with a whole lot of rhetorical bullshit pared away. Obviously, you can think of it whatever you wish. But please don't dismiss it as some finger-wagging Dr. Laura sermon. None of this is about morality, or religion, or dogma, or big fancy questions of life after death. The capital- T Truth is about life before death. It is about making it to 30, or maybe 50, without wanting to shoot yourself in the head. It is about simple awareness — awareness of what is so real and essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, that we have to keep reminding ourselves, over and over: “This is water, this is water.”  It is unimaginably hard to do this, to stay conscious and alive, day in and day out.”

“There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says "Morning, boys. How's the water?" And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes "What the hell is water?".....

It is about the real value of a real education, which has almost nothing to do with knowledge, and everything to do with simple awareness; awareness of what is so real and essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, all the time, that we have to keep reminding ourselves over and over:  "This is water."  "This is water.”


“It is extremely difficult to stay alert & attentive instead of getting hypnotized by the constant monolog inside your head.”

“the patriotic or religious bumper stickers always seem to be on the biggest, most disgustingly selfish vehicles driven by the ugliest, most inconsiderate and aggressive drivers, who are usually talking on cell phones as they cut people off in order to get just twenty stupid feet ahead in the traffic jam...”



Quotes from David Foster Wallace - Infinite Jest

Quotes: David Foster Wallace- from Infinite Jest

The Ego
“Everybody is identical in their secret unspoken belief that way deep down they are different from everyone else.”

 “You will become way less concerned with what other people think of you when you realize how seldom they do.”

“But someone sometime let you forget how to choose, and what. Someone let your peoples forget it was the only thing of importance, choosing. . . How to choose any but a child's greedy choices if there is no loving-filled father to guide, inform, teach the person how to choose? How is there freedom to choose if one does not learn how to choose?”


“We all have our little solipsistic delusions, ghastly intuitions of utter singularity: that we are the only one in the house who ever fills the ice-cube tray, who unloads the clean dishwasher, who occasionally pees in the shower, whose eyelid twitches on first dates; that only we take casualness terribly seriously; that only we fashion supplication into courtesy; that only we hear the whiny pathos in a dog’s yawn, the timeless sigh in the opening of the hermetically-sealed jar, the splattered laugh in the frying egg, the minor-D lament in the vacuum’s scream; that only we feel the panic at sunset the rookie kindergartner feels at his mother’s retreat. That only we love the only-we. That only we need the only-we. Solipsism binds us together, J.D. knows. That we feel lonely in a crowd; stop not to dwell on what’s brought the crowd into being. That we are, always, faces in a crowd.”

“We are all dying to give our lives away to something, maybe. God or Satan, politics or grammar, topology or philately - the object seemed incidental to this will to give ourselves away, utterly. To games or needles, to some other person. Something pathetic about it. A flight-from in the form of a plunging-into. Flight from exactly what? These rooms, blandly filled with excrement and heat? To what purpose?”

It is a level of psychic pain wholly incompatible with human life as we know it. It is a sense of radical and thoroughgoing evil not just as a feature but as the essence of conscious existence. It is a sense of poisoning that pervades the self at the self's most elementary levels. It is a nausea of the cells and soul. It is an unnumb intuition in which the world is fully rich and animate and un-map-like and also thoroughly painful and malignant and antagonistic to the self, which depressed self It billows on and coagulates around and wraps in Its black folds and absorbs into Itself, so that an almost mystical unity is achieved with a world every constituent of which means painful harm to the self. Its emotional character, the feeling Gompert describes It as, is probably mostly indescribable except as a sort of double bind in which any/all of the alternatives we associate with human agency — sitting or standing, doing or resting, speaking or keeping silent, living or dying — are not just unpleasant but literally horrible.

“life's endless war against the self you cannot live without.”

Choose your attachments carefully. Choose your temple of fanaticism with great care.

That the people to be the most frightened of are the people who are the most frightened. That it takes great personal courage to let yourself appear weak. That no single, individual moment is in and of itself unendurable.

That other people can often see things about you that you yourself cannot see, even if those people are stupid. That having a lot of money does not immunize people from suffering or fear. That trying to dance sober is a whole different kettle of fish.

That different people have radically different ideas of basic personal hygiene.  That, perversely, it is often more fun to want something than to have it.  That if you do something nice for somebody in secret, anonymously, without letting the person you did it for know it was you or anybody else know what it was you did or in any way or form trying to get credit for it, it’s almost its own form of intoxicating buzz.  That anonymous generosity, too, can be abused.  That it is permissible to want.  That everybody is identical in their unspoken belief that way deep down they are different from everyone else. That this isn’t necessarily perverse.  That there might not be angels, but there are people who might as well be angels.”

“This wise old whiskery fish swims up to three young fish and goes, 'Morning, boys, how's the water?' and swims away; and the three young fish watch him swim away and look at each other and go, 'What the fuck is water?' and swim away.”

“Try to let what is unfair teach you…what is unfair can be a stern but invaluable teacher…you can be shaped, or you can be broken. There is not much in between. Try to learn. Be coachable. Try to learn from everybody, especially those who fail. This is hard.”

“That it takes great personal courage to let yourself appear weak.”

“And then also, again, still, what are those boundaries, if they’re not baselines, that contain and direct its infinite expansion inward, that make tennis like chess on the run, beautiful and infinitely dense? The true opponent, the enfolding boundary, is the player himself. Always and only the self out there, on court, to be met, fought, brought to the table to hammer out terms. The competing boy on the net’s other side: he is not the foe: he is more the partner in the dance. He is the what is the word excuse or occasion for meeting the self. As you are his occasion. Tennis’s beauty’s infinite roots are self-competitive. You compete with your own limits to transcend the self in imagination and execution. Disappear inside the game: break through limits: transcend: improve: win. Which is why tennis is an essentially tragic enterprise… You seek to vanquish and transcend the limited self whose limits make the game possible in the first place. It is tragic and sad and chaotic and lovely. All life is the same, as citizens of the human State: the animating limits are within, to be killed and mourned, over and over again…Mario thinks hard again. He’s trying to think of how to articulate something like: But then is battling and vanquishing the self the same as destroying yourself? Is that like saying life is pro-death? … And then but so what’s the difference between tennis and suicide, life and death, the game and its own end?”

“so full of himself he could have shit limbs.”





Loneliness
“I think there must be probably different types of suicides. I'm not one of the self-hating ones. The type of like "I'm shit and the world'd be better off without poor me" type that says that but also imagines what everybody'll say at their funeral. I've met types like that on wards. Poor-me-I-hate-me-punish-me-come-to-my-funeral. Then they show you a 20 X 25 glossy of their dead cat. It's all self-pity bullshit. It's bullshit. I didn't have any special grudges. I didn't fail an exam or get dumped by anybody. All these types. Hurt themselves. I didn't want to especially hurt myself. Or like punish. I don't hate myself. I just wanted out. I didn't want to play anymore is all. I wanted to just stop being conscious. I'm a whole different type. I wanted to stop feeling this way. If I could have just put myself in a really long coma I would have done that. Or given myself shock I would have done that. Instead.”

“... That no single, individual moment is in and of itself unendurable.”

...Hal, who’s empty but not dumb, theorizes privately that what passes for hip cynical transcendence of sentiment is really some kind of fear of being really human, since to be really human (at least as he conceptualizes it) is probably to be unavoidably sentimental and naive and goo-prone and generally pathetic, is to be in some basic interior way forever infantile, some sort of not-quite-right-looking infant dragging itself anaclitically around the map, with big wet eyes and froggy-soft skin, huge skull, gooey drool. One of the really American things about Hal, probably, is the way he despises what it is he’s really lonely for: this hideous internal self, incontinent of sentiment and need, that pules and writhes just under the hip empty mask, anhedonia.”

“That having sex with someone you do not care for feels lonelier than not having sex in the first place, afterward.  That it is permissible to want.  That everybody is identical in their secret unspoken belief that way deep down they are different from everyone else. That this isn't necessarily perverse.  That there might not be angels, but there are people who might as well be angels.  That God — unless you're Charlton Heston, or unhinged, or both — speaks and acts entirely through the vehicle of human beings, if there is a God.  That God might regard the issue of whether you believe there's a God or not as fairly low on his/her/its list of things s/he/it's interested in re you.”

“...loneliness is not a function of solitude.”

“It's of some interest that the lively arts of the millennial U.S.A. treat anhedonia and internal emptiness as hip and cool. It's maybe the vestiges of the Romantic glorification of Weltschmerz, which means world-weariness or hip ennui. Maybe it's the fact that most of the arts here are produced by world-weary and sophisticated older people and then consumed by younger people who not only consume art but study it for clues on how to be cool, hip—and keep in mind that, for kids and younger people, to be hip and cool is the same as to be admired and accepted and included and so Unalone. Forget so-called peer-pressure. It's more like peer-hunger. No? We enter a spiritual puberty where we snap to the fact that the great transcendent horror is loneliness, excluded encagement in the self. Once we’ve hit this age, we will now give or take anything, wear any mask, to fit, to be part-of, not be Alone, we young. The U.S. arts are our guide to inclusion. A how-to. We are shown how to fashion masks of ennui and jaded irony at a young age where the face is fictile enough to assume the shape of whatever it wears. And then it’s stuck there, the weary cynicism that saves us from gooey sentiment and unsophisticated naïveté. Sentiment equals naïveté on this continent.”

“Don’t cry, Booboo. Remember the flag only halfway up the pole? Booboo, there are two ways to lower a flag to half-mast. Are you listening? Because no shit I really have to sleep here in a second.  So listen - one way to lower the flag to half mast is just to lower the flag. There’s another way though. You can also just raise the pole. You can raise the pole to like twice its original height. You get me? You understand what I mean, Mario?”

“A U.S. of modern A. where the State is not a team or a code, but a sort of sloppy intersection of desires and fears, where the only public consensus a boy must surrender to is the acknowledged primacy of straight-line pursuing this flat and short-sighted idea of personal happiness: The happy pleasure of the person alone, yes?”

“One of the really American things about Hal, probably, is the way he despises what it is he's really lonely for”


Addiction
“--and then you're in serious trouble, very serious trouble, and you know it, finally, deadly serious trouble, because this Substance you thought was your one true friend, that you gave up all for, gladly, that for so long gave you relief from the pain of the Losses your love of that relief caused, your mother and lover and god and compadre, has finally removed its smily-face mask to reveal centerless eyes and a ravening maw, and canines down to here, it's the Face In The Floor, the grinning root-white face of your worst nightmares, and the face is your own face in the mirror, now, it's you, the Substance has devoured or replaced and become you, and the puke-, drool- and Substance-crusted T-shirt you've both worn for weeks now gets torn off and you stand there looking and in the root-white chest where your heart (given away to It) should be beating, in its exposed chest's center and centerless eyes is just a lightless hole, more teeth, and a beckoning taloned hand dangling something irresistible, and now you see you've been had, screwed royal, stripped and fucked and tossed to the side like some stuffed toy to lie for all time in the posture you land in. You see now that It's your enemy and your worst personal nightmare and the trouble It's gotten you into is undeniable and you still can't stop. Doing the Substance now is like attending Black Mass but you still can't stop, even though the Substance no longer gets you high. You are, as they say, Finished. You cannot get drunk and you cannot get sober; you cannot get high and you cannot get straight. You are behind bars; you are in a cage and can see only bars in every direction. You are in the kind of a hell of a mess that either ends lives or turns them around.”

“If, by the virtue of charity or the circumstance of desperation, you ever chance to spend a little time around a Substance-recovery halfway facility like Enfield MA's state-funded Ennet House, you will acquire many exotic new facts [...] That certain persons simply will not like you no matter what you do. Then that most nonaddicted adult civilians have already absorbed and accepted this fact, often rather early on [...] That sleeping can be a form of emotional escape and can with sustained effort be abused [...] That purposeful sleep-deprivation can also be an abusable escape. That gambling can be an abusable escape, too, and work, shopping, and shoplifting, and sex, and abstention, and masturbation, and food, and exercise, and meditation/prayer [...] That loneliness is not a function of solitude [...] That if enough people in a silent room are drinking coffee it is possible to make out the sound of steam coming off the coffee. That sometimes human beings have to just sit in one place and, like, hurt [...] That there is such a thing as raw, unalloyed, agendaless kindness [...] That the effects of too many cups of coffee are in no way pleasant or intoxicating [...] That if you do something nice for somebody in secret, anonymously, without letting the person you did it for know it was you or anybody else know what it was you did or in any way or form trying to get credit for it, it's almost its own form of intoxicating buzz.  That anonymous generosity, too, can be abused [...] That it is permissible to want [...]  That there might not be angels, but there are people who might as well be angels.”






God

“...when he kneels at other times and prays or meditates or tries to achieve a Big-Picture spiritual understanding of God as he can understand Him, he feels Nothing — not nothing, but Nothing, an edgeless blankness that somehow feels worse than the sort of unconsidered atheism he Came In with.”

“(She) says that she's finding it especially hard to take when these earnest ravaged folks at the lectern say they're `Here But For the Grace of God,' except that's not the strange thing she says, because when Gately nods hard and starts to interject about `It was the same for--' and wants to launch into a fairly standard Boston AA agnostic-soothing riff about the `God' in the slogan being just shorthand for a totally subjective and up-to-you `Higher Power' and AA being merely spiritual instead of dogmatically religious, a sort of benign anarchy of subjective spirit, Joelle cuts off his interjection and says that but that her trouble with it is that `But For the Grace of God' is a subjunctive, a counterfactual, she says, and can make sense only when introducing a conditional clause, like e.g. `But For the Grace of God I would have died on Molly Notkin's bathroom floor,' so that an indicative transposition like `I'm here But For the Grace of God' is, she says, literally senseless, and regardless of whether she hears it or not it's meaningless, and that the foamy enthusiasm with which these folks can say what in fact means nothing at all makes her want to put her head in a Radarange at the thought that Substances have brought her to the sort of pass where this is the sort of language she has to have Blind Faith in.”

“Todd, trust math. As in Matics, Math E. First-order predicate logic. Never fail you. Quantities and their relation. Rates of change. The vital statistics of God or equivalent. When all else fails. When the boulder's slid all the way back to the bottom. When the headless are blaming. When you do not know your way about. You can fall back and regroup around math. Whose truth is deductive truth. Independent of sense or emotionality. The syllogism. The identity. Modus Tollens. Transitivity. Heaven's theme song. The night light on life's dark wall, late at night. Heaven's recipe book. The hydrogen spiral. The methane, ammonia, H2O. Nucleic acids. A and G, T and C. The creeping inevibatility. Caius is mortal. Math is not mortal. What it is is: listen: it's true.”


“[...] at this point the God-understanding stuff kind of makes him want to puke, from fear. Something you can't see or hear or touch or smell: OK. All right. But something you can't even feel? Because that's what he feels when he tries to understand something to really sincerely pray to. Nothingness. He says when he tries to pray he gets this like image in his mind's eye of the brainwaves or whatever of his prayers going out and out, with nothing to stop them, going, going, radiating out into like space and outliving him and still going and never hitting Anything out there, much less Something with an ear. Much much less Something with an ear that could possibly give a rat's ass.”


Odds and Ends

“Try to learn to let what is unfair teach you.”

“It did what all ads are supposed to do: create an anxiety relievable by purchase.”

“It's weird to feel like you miss someone you're not even sure you know.”

“What metro Boston AAs are trite but correct about is that both destiny's kisses and its dope-slaps illustrate an individual person's basic personal powerlessness over the really meaningful events in their life: i.e almost nothing important that ever happens to you happens because you engineer it. Destiny has no beeper; destiny always leans trenchcoated out of an alley with some sort of Psst that you usually can't even hear because you're in such a rush to or from something important you've tried to engineer.” ―

“That sometimes human beings have to just sit in one place and, like, hurt. That you will become way less concerned with what other people think of you when you realize how seldom they do. That there is such a thing as raw, unalloyed, agendaless kindness. That it is possible to fall asleep during an anxiety attack. That concentrating on anything is very hard work.”


“What if sometimes there is no choice about what to love? What if the temple comes to Mohammed? What if you just love? without deciding? You just do: you see her and in that instant are lost to sober account-keeping and cannot choose but to love?”


“Please learn the pragmatics of expressing fear: sometimes words that seem to express really invoke.  This can be tricky.”

“The boy, who did everything well and with a natural unslumped grace the wraith himself had always lacked, and whom the wraith had been so terribly eager to see and hear and let him (the son) know he was seen and heard, the son had become a steadily more and more hidden boy, toward the wraith's life's end; and no one else in the wraith and the boy's nuclear family would see or acknowledge this, the fact that the graceful and marvelous boy was disappearing, right before their eyes. They looked but did not see his invisibility.”


I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell.  The ones who give nothing away.”

“...the sun would leave my sky if I couldn't assume you'd simply come and tell me you were sad.”

maybe the Prettiest Girl Of All Time (Prettiest G.O.A.T.),


“Their handshake looked, for the first split-second he looked, like C.T. was jacking off and the little girl was going Sieg Heil.”

“He says I was around five and crying and was vividly red in the cold spring air. I was saying something over and over; he couldn’t make it out until our mother saw me and shut down the tiller, ears ringing, and came over to see what I was holding out. This turned out to have been a large patch of mold—Orin posits from some dark corner of the Weston home’s basement, which was warm from the furnace and flooded every spring. The patch itself he describes as horrific: darkly green, glossy, vaguely hirsute, speckled with parasitic fungal points of yellow, orange, red. Worse, they could see that the patch looked oddly incomplete, gnawed-on; and some of the nauseous stuff was smeared around my open mouth. ‘I ate this,”


“I am not sure whether you could call this abuse, but when I was (long ago) abroad in the world of dry men, I saw parents, usually upscale and educated and talented and functional and white, patient and loving and supportive and concerned and involved in their children’s lives, profilgate with compliments and diplomatic with constructive criticism, loquacious in their pronouncements of unconditional love for and approval of their children, conforming to every last jot-tittle in any conceivably definition of a good parent, I saw parent after unimpeachable parent who raised kids who were (a) emotionally retarded or (b) lethally self-indulgent or (c) chronically depressed or (d) borderline psychotic or (e) consumed with narcissistic self-loathing or (f) neurotically driven/addicted or (g) variously psychosomatically Disabled or (h) some conjunctive permutation of (a) … (g).

Why is this. Why do many parents who seem relentlessly bent on producing children who feel they are good persons deserving of love produce children who grow to feel they are hideous persons not deserving of love who just happen to have lucked into having parents so marvelous that the parents love them even though they are hideous?

Is it a sign of abuse if a mother produces a child who believes not that he is innately beautiful and lovable and deserving of magnificent maternal treatment but somehow that he is a hideous unlovable child who has somehow lucked in to having a really magnificent mother? Probably not.

But could such a mother then really be all that magnificent, if that’s the child’s view of himself?

“somebody had taken an old disk of McCartney and the Wings - as in the historical Beatles's McCartney - taken and run it through a Kurtzweil remixer and removed every track on the songs except the tracks of poor old Mrs. Linda McCartney singing backup and playing tambourine....


Poor old Mrs. Linda McCartney just fucking could not sing, and having her shaky off-key little voice flushed from the cover of the whole slick multitrack corporate sound and pumped up to solo was to Gately unspeakably depressing - her voice sounding so lost, trying to hide and bury itself inside the pro backups' voices; Gately imagined Mrs. Linda McCartney - in his Staff room's wall's picture a kind of craggy-face blonde - imagined her standing there lost in the sea of her husband's pro noise, feeling low esteem and whispering off-key, not knowing quite when to shake her tambourine: C's depressing CD was past cruel, it was somehow sadistic-seeming, like drilling a peephole in the wall of a handicapped bathroom.”